To understand the problems we must aim at the heart of them and not to "distract" from other speeches.
This principle also applies to the dismantling of the former CAPS (refugee camp) in progress.
The facts: some families of Romanians in recent weeks, as well as the announcement of the clearing near future, have also been made dry by the city that pulled off the water with the official reason for a loss.
The representatives of these families, assisted by its legal and responsible for Caserta 's Opera Nomadi Association were received by the Mayor that took stock of the situation.
I was present at the meeting, but not later than here in detail the varied solutions for families to find new accommodations to rent because, as I said at the beginning, I would fall into the trap of those who want to "distract" the speech trumpeting themes of safety and health conditions.
All true, all right, but not understand the "problem" if you do throw off from conversations on illegal immigration, prostitution, theft and looting by of these people.
Our Mayor forgets that perhaps we live in a province that has the highest crime rates in Europe, and this is all our local!
But come down to it, to describe what is being accessed in this area of \u200b\u200bour city: the situation of absolute emergency sanitation, and in this we can not agree with our Mayor, but it should be noted that the waste storage are not present in civilian homes, thus the result of those who lived in these years, but are repaid, for decades, resulting materials from work and were abandoned at the site without any control by the authorities. A dump of this kind does not accumulate in a month, and then there The question: where in recent years who had to watch?
said that, it should be added that today the project area and target constructions for popular residence, faded as the hypothesis of the now elusive single hospital and Santa Maria Capua CV
on this project and the ongoing demolition current ask those who minister to us:
have analyzed the alternatives for recovery of the buildings? none of which were unsafe or so decrepit as to require the demolition!
As for cost, the decision to demolish the community, going to dispose of materials and then rebuild? and for whom all this?
Personally, if I had a good, even in decay, I would try to start work on his recovery, rather than reduce it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment