continues direct line that IDV has established with the citizens of Capua by the release of weekly bulletins, targati Fieramosca on topical issues.
The "Fieramosca n.4" this week has a double-sided format.
The first, entitled " Our commitment to the city " explains the concepts that underlie the work of IDV. The priorities which the Club has been assigned to the related problems facing our city, which is now at historic lows of living and future prospects for young people. This is the result of five years of directors who "shine" for an exaggerated activism but, alas, for the absence of an equally extreme transparency in its work. On the contrary, all the projects proposed IDV for the city of Capua and its territory as they met: a non-negotiable fairness, this is because all citizens have equal rights and duties , a non-negotiable transparency this because if you really work for the common good and for the good of the city there is no reason not to make public its actions.
The second side of the bulletin this week is dedicated to TARSU. As promised a week ago, completed analysis of our working group will publish the results. Refer for details to the full text is published on the website of IDV-Capua at: http://idvcapua.blogspot.com .
In short, it is not true that state, with the usual triumphant tone but empty of content, our administrators when they say "The City did not blame on the TARSU, even with all the tools in his possession, he fought for this to not happen. The mutual trust that binds us compels me to inform you that anyone who tries to argue the opposite, shows off the public of a serious and profound ignorance " . And then " municipal service responsibility has not increased a single cent! " This statement represents an act of cunning Accounting - administrative and like all acts of cunning, are not allowed when you put your hands in the pockets of taxpayers.
's like saying: " also insult to injury! " .
down, in fact, the detail of amounts of 'good-natured notice of payment TARSU that citizens have received, are to be added to the tax calculated No 2 (two) imposts: the additional ex-ECA 10% and 5% Provincial Tribute.
The additional ex-ECA is imposed and collected by our City at 10%, not more roles, but for direct collection, which is the body proceeding is entitled to levy the TARSU, not through the dealer but IAP by direct collection. The effect of Article 30 paragraph 3 of Law No. 549/1995, the loss of exclusivity of the role for the TARSU involves the inapplicability of additionality ex-ECA and consequently the loss of this amount was attributed directly to the City by the Grantee of recovery. Unfortunately, the additional 10% ex-ECA is still imposed and collected in our municipality, despite the collection of Role for TARSU not happen again, but for direct collection, resulting in one part of a tightening TARSU borne by the taxpayers, (other than penny!) and the other a sovragettito in the Assessor should explain their use.
But there's more: the amount the City collects, unlike the case for the provincial Tribute, have no place in the 2011 Budget . Therefore, the failure to indicate the amount paid to effect the collection of additionality, it allows one side to the city to circumvent the legislative provision, to achieve full coverage of 100% of costs provided by law, and the other to the Mayor and Administration cover all the hidden costs to explain.
0 comments:
Post a Comment