QUESTION: The IDV has chosen its candidate for mayor . It 'a downward spiral? and what possibilities there are for the restructuring of the coalition in the wake of provincial meetings?
IDV: I state that the constitution of the Circle of IDV Capua is a project that seeks out and fits into the wider renewal of cadres from the party started in our area in recent months. The election date of May is only a first for us and important test for a job that will take place later in the coming years. On the issue of candidacy for mayor back, urged by his question, almost reluctantly. First, because we have repeatedly stated and restated, both in the press is a national manifesto, our position: the candidacy of Dr. . Paternuosto , we propose to the voters, is a candidate in the weight is politically and in terms social, as Dr. Paternuosto a respected professional, leader and Head Department of Gastroenterology, as well as city councilor in the town of IDV Marcianise . And also because, and here I speak as a citizen of Capua, I think it a priority to speak to the problems faced by the city and propose a new approach: a way that makes his style as the seriousness and transparency, putting the wealth common to every other party interests. On the provincial meetings, which she calls, I can say that as a Circle of Capua are in constant contact with our Provincial Coordination, which we have spoken to them of the meetings of "inter-party province" that were held in recent weeks, and as these meetings are never disclosed anything to a different location.
 |
| Add Caption |
QUESTION: Can you give an opinion outgoing administration?
IDV: The decision on the administration incumbent can not be positive, from all points of view. Without wishing to exploit the problems, I think it is sufficient to analyze some of the results to understand that the triumphalist tone of the Mayor or outgoing should be shrunk dramatically. In its latest statement, "end office", in line with our Prime Minister has always said to be the best Prime Minister for 150 years, the Mayor said that quote in our city " all this, in the last 100 years together in five years, had never been done . Certainly, no one questions the hyperactivity of this administration, doubts (and high) rise but when you go to see the sights. It is not clear, in fact, as you think you have made the interest of the city with the new parking plan. Judge the results: the parking esplanade Olivares, Faculty of Economics, is open until 19:30 and is closed on Saturdays and Sundays, does not contain any form of relief for residents and thirty years the company has an expectation private who built it. Mind you, because this is crucial, not works the administration realizes that it be pride, but that the private financing and then keeps them in management for decades. In technical terms, this is called " Project Financing "In practical terms, if the administrator does not call for specific posts, already under competitive tender, this is called" damage to the city . In recent months I have repeatedly asked for evidence, and received no answer, on which fees will be applied to the car park of Piazza Umberto to know if and what types of subscription will be provided for residents. The fear that will double the "damage" to pave Olivares increases when one considers that, when discussing the new parking lot, our administrators spend only praise for the helmet to be built multimedia Fieramosca on the square, as info-points of the city. My opinion: if I make a parking lot for the city I have to notify immediately the number of seats, opening hours, fees and subscriptions. Everything else, including works of art media, it becomes just smoke and mirrors. And here come the lack of transparency, which was the main requirement that has characterized the actions of this administration. Another example? Here it is: today, a few months after opening the playground Via Napoli, the assessor in office, continues to declare that the work, which he strongly desired, is "wonderful and free." Too bad that the notice issued by the City contains precisely, and these are the posts I referred to earlier, the number of rides and the maximum price to be applied by the operator, in this case twenty years. Unfortunately for him, is the same Councillor to disavow himself when, by posting the notice to schools to name the park, called for children winners, a number of free tickets for rides! The examples could go on. I do not dwell on today recycling declared "miraculous", with a self to be a virtuous community and then impose a TARSU that increases by 20%, I do not dwell on the budget of the City, worthy of serious study of assessment before " shoot electoral numbers, " but on this occasion will not come back for the necessary completeness. Proper management should ensure transparency to the citizens, what I would say is that we are tired of hearing that administrators " solve problems " ... our action in the coming years, administrators will tend to want that, unlike , does not "create problems !
QUESTION: Instead, a case on appeal?
IDV: It would be too easy, perhaps too easy, but unfair and ungenerous to those who have managed to find all the faults in a city that today is at its lows of living and prospects for the future of young people. If those who administer is committed to operate with transparency for the Common Good, who is the opposition has the specific task of realizing it. All this, in my opinion, over the past five years, was not the case with the necessary force and conviction. Too often the opposition has been listless . If I know I'm in the minority, I know that my vote has only a negative effect on the formal vote, what is needed instead is echoing throughout the city and a decision its consequences. This unfortunately is not. I have two examples: as a minority had been to establish a useful " Commission for the Protection, Warranty and Transparency . Well, you know how often this committee has met in five years? Only twice: first to confirm its components, the second to define its objectives. Then, apparently frightened by the aims, everyone has withdrawn from all the work of the committee. A second example: some will remember that at the beginning of consigliatura in 2006 for a few weeks he could not keep the City Council because there was no "separate banquet for an adviser who did not consider himself " neither right nor left . For some time the banquet is no longer needed because who else has had to sit there, and more comfortable sitting. And so it happened to other former opponents who felt more "comfortable " no objection. IDV believe in the seriousness of the political. To ensure fidelity to the commitments, IDV ask their candidates for the express assent to the Code of Ethics of the Party and the "European Code of conduct for elected local and regional" and define every precautionary measure to citizens / voters to Similar mishaps "Post-election".
QUESTION: What are the goals of the IDV of the electoral competition?
IDV: A key objective Our aim is to awaken the civic consciousness of the people and closer to politics than it keep their distance because they consider it a "dirty thing." Our city is characterized by a heated election campaign, a kind of village fair which takes place every five years. But then passed the electoral event, and they all fade into the socio-political commitments already we see burning in the city in recent months. Nothing is further from the truth. Citizens should be aware of their role, consistent over time, and understand that each of us is the "first citizen" and not just what will come out winner of the election . IDV's commitment is to always be on the side of citizens. We plan to gather around us all the healthy forces who will share this journey, which will be characterized by transparency and legality and viable in a shared with those who truly believe in a real policy change. All projects share the following IDV is proposing a non-negotiable impartiality, This is because all citizens have equal rights and obligations, transparency and non-negotiable this because if you really work for the common good and for the good of the city there is no reason not to make public its actions .
0 comments:
Post a Comment